HR leaders are confronting an unprecedented challenge: a dramatic surge in overqualified applicants willing to accept positions below their experience level, fundamentally disrupting traditional hiring and talent management strategies.  

New research from global career expert TopResume reveals that nearly two-thirds (64.8%) of professionals would apply for roles beneath their qualifications, with over a quarter (26.2%) having already done so. The findings signal a critical inflection point for HR departments navigating talent acquisition, retention, and workforce planning in an increasingly volatile labor market.  

The new research exposes a troubling reality for hiring managers. Almost six in 10 (59.3%) professionals report being told they were “overqualified” at least once in the past year, with 30.7% hearing it once and 28.7% receiving this feedback multiple times. This phenomenon is compressing the talent pool and creating difficult decisions for HR professionals, balancing candidate quality with cultural fit and retention risk.  

The survey uncovered a counterintuitive finding that has significant implications for succession planning and leadership development: senior executives are the most willing to accept demotions.  

Willingness to apply for roles below experience level: 

  • senior leadership (directors and department heads): 92.6%; 
  • senior-level professionals (senior managers/leads): 92.9%; and 
  • mid-level professionals (specialists/managers): 88.9%. 

Additionally, 70% of professionals are open to stepping down in seniority, with one in four senior-level executives willing to move down two or more organizational levels, a trend that could disrupt internal mobility programs and career pathing frameworks.  

The research reveals employees’ willingness to make substantial financial compensation sacrifices, which has direct implications for compensation strategy and benefits positioning. This includes 75% of professionals who would accept a pay cut to secure employment, 33.2% who would accept a 5% to 10% salary reduction, and 21% who would accept a 11% to 20% cut. Men are significantly more likely than women to accept 11% to 20% pay cuts.  

For HR professionals focused on employee value proposition and retention strategies, the survey identifies a clear priority shift: work-life balance now outweighs economic necessity as the primary driver for career moves.  

Professionals would consider lower-level roles for: 

  • work-life balance (64.5%); 
  • economic necessity (42.5%); 
  • career-change opportunities (38%); 
  • less responsibility/stress (27.8%); and 
  • fewer senior roles available (25.2%). 

This trend holds across all professional levels, with two-thirds or more of senior professionals citing work-life balance as their primary motivator, a finding that should inform benefits design, flexible work policies, and retention initiatives.  

Understanding job-seeking behaviors can help HR teams refine their recruitment strategies. The top obstacles these professionals face include: 

  • not enough roles available (38.7%); 
  • too much competition (36.1%); and 
  • being “overqualified” for available roles (31.7%). 

Among senior professionals, the “overqualified” barrier is even more pronounced, with 38.6% seeing it as their biggest challenge, rising to 40.2% among directors and department heads. Rather than giving up, professionals are applying for roles below their qualifications (25.8%), taking additional courses or training to stay competitive (22.5%), and practicing “job hugging” (66%).  

“Thanks to a mix of economic uncertainty, AI-driven disruptions, and growing work-life balance tradeoffs, senior professionals are now more willing than ever to target lower-level job opportunities,” says Amanda Augustine, resident career expert for TopResume and a certified professional career coach (CPCC). “For employers, that means access to highly experienced talent at a discount, which may feel like a win in the short term. But for the professionals making these moves, the long-term impact could be significant, from stalled career growth to lower earning potential down the road.”  

Shares: